Poem for a Businessman

My employer wants to standardise our curriculum

 

I have no problem with him doing that

as long as he doesn’t expect me to teach it that way

 

He’d have to standardise the kids, first

 

I dare him

Take Your Adult To Life Day

Radio Free School recently put up a blog about changing the way we view teens.  I spend most of my time with teenagers; I actually think they’re not much different from adults.  I take that back: most of the time, they’re easier to get along with.

RFS  quotes Robert Epstein’s The Case Against Adolescence: Rediscovering the Adult in Every Teen: “Our views can reasonably be conceived of as a kind of irrational prejudice programmed by our culture-almost precisely the kind that mainstream Americans bore towards women and blacks until very recent times,” says Epstein.

They then say: What we need then is more avenues, more opportunities for this to take place-for adults and kids to come face to face in meaningful ways. Take your kid to school day won’t cut it.
I want to hear your ideas and experiences on what can be done (what is being done) to restore the continuum. Please write in.

Some of the suggestions include getting rid of high school and put the kids into something more like apprenticeship work programmes.  Not a bad idea.  Why do we expect children to go to school until they’re about 23 years old, and then go into work?  Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.

I’d like to flip it around a bit, though.  Rather than having the kids live our lives for a day, how about we live theirs?  What if each teenager got to make an adult get up three hours earlier than they wanted to, hang around school for 7 or 8 hours, work a crappy job for a few hours, then do two or three hours of homework?  They could also make the adults sit on the floor in a big, affectionate pile and talk about love, religion, politics, society, etc.  They could make the adults listen to music which makes them feel extreme emotions.  They could show the adults what it feels like to risk their health-and-well-being by leaping fences, BMXing, fleeing the schoolyard in a frenzy of parkour or crossing the road against the light.  They could make the adults try something new or do something unpleasant just because it’s good for their character.

The teenagers didn’t choose this lifestyle for themselves: adults created it for them.  We decided this was good for them, and then we complain because they don’t act like adults.  I think we’re just ticked off with them because they still have youth and freedom and all those things we want to have but got rid of in favour of careers and money and material goods.  I think if our society is to the point where someone has the audacity to write a book about why we don’t like a whole group of people, maybe the fault is really, really easy to pinpoint.

You Did Want “Creative”, Yeah?

Been thinking a lot about the process of writing.  Why can I really nail it sometimes, and other times miss the broad side of the barn?

I can’t remember where I read it but I once heard that Susan Musgrave ended up covering a creative writing class for someone and had to teach her own work.  One of the questions in the text was “What was the author thinking when she wrote this poem?”  Musgrave, of course, didn’t know the answer herself and said so in derisive terms.  Wonder if the students received better marks for giving a truthful answer.

Recently, someone has been asking me where I get the ideas for my stories.  I’m embarrassed to answer, not because I’ve been doing exotic or illicit things but because it makes me seem really quite schizophrenic.  Perhaps I was traumatised by my second-year Creative Writing professor (I use the term “professor” loosely; actually, I’m surprised I didn’t need therapy after surviving both my first- and second-year Creative Writing classes).  This would have been in 1989 (according to the literary magazine the poem was printed in, anyway) so forgive the lack of writing ability; I promise you I’m much better at it now.  Here’s the poem:

The Flower Gathering

Keane was putting nasturtiums in the salad

marigolds in the vegetables

pansies in the bread.

Joan pronounced the salmon to be ready

and

Mary and Andrew kissed in their newly-wed way.

Alex fell rather far into a bottle

of sweet red wine.

We all had hibiscus blossoms in our hair

braided hair and long

our skirts long

our thoughts longing.

Guthrie in one room

Dylan in the other

Charity had her guitar in the back yard

sitting among the blue delphinium.

This was our time of being.


Zachary ate the poinsettia leaves.

 

Each of us had to explain the thinking behind our poem.   Well, I was living in Windsor and the city had poisoned all the rats in the alleys so my roommate and I were having to clean up all the dead rats from the back yard.  My cat, Zachary, was sitting in the kitchen window, killing himself in his efforts to get outside and eat all the poisoned rats.  The last line of the poem wrote itself from this scenario, and the rest followed in order from the beginning.  I changed two words from the first draft.

The professor said I must be lying because that’s not the way poems get written.

That’s the way my poems get written.

Sometimes, like Susan Musgrave, I have no idea what I’m thinking as I write things.  My brain creates them, and I try not to get too close to my brain.  I believe my better writing – creative or otherwise – happens when I don’t think too much.  People compliment the things which are spewed from the 8th circle of my brain.  When I analyse and consider and contemplate, the pieces fall apart.  Nice, ordered pieces from the 1st level get comments like “Well, it’s good….”

So, this is my new criteria for writing: if I can answer any questions about it, the piece sucks and you shouldn’t be forced to read it.  If you really like it, I can’t answer a single question so don’t bother asking. If you persist, I’ll think you’re trying to get into my head, after which you’ll need therapy and I don’t think insurance companies cover Acts of Writing.

Learning Curves Are Exhausting

Haven’t been writing much here because I am apparently in one of those learning cycles where I’m the one doing all the learning, and sometimes it’s a bit chaotic in my head until I get things all sorted out.  Of course, once it’s all sorted out, I get handed another bunch of things to sort out.  Toss in the mundane life I lead (children, pets, laundry) and I can understand why the famous artsy types often resorted to absinthe.  I’ve never had absinthe but if someone put a bottle on my desk I might be tempted.

This week’s lessons involve writing of the creative sort.  I haven’t had a whole lot of work in the past couple of months, so I’ve been puttering away at some stories.  The TDot workshops (I gave up the meetups, ’cause they were just about socialising and why would I work on useful things like social skills when I found a group of people who indulge my inclination to isolate myself and play with words?) have been life-savers.  I traded stories with one person who has this absolutely… purified voice.  Not a word is wasted; no word could be replaced by a synonym.  Even though he writes on subject matter I wouldn’t usually choose, I love reading his stuff just because he can put together the clearest, most concise paragraphs I’ve ever seen.  He went through my latest stories, and this morning I was sitting in front of my computer repeating, “Oh, yeah, that’s what I meant to say.”  I’m gonna have to give him co-authorship if I ever get published….

This guy has one fault, though: he writes in American English.  I know, I’m being ridiculous.  One language is as relevant and acceptable as the other.  However, one is certainly more beautiful.  Yes, John Dewey had a point regarding the lunacy of British spelling but what about the elegance of the spelling?  When one is reading, would one rather read dialog or dialogue?  It’s the difference between sack cloth and silk.

I also have a problem with American punctuation because it leaves no room for self-expression.  What if the sentence really needs a pause before a conjunction?  Why would I put a period inside the quotation marks when the end of the sentence is outside the quotation marks? Punctuation should be used to communicate voice, not to standardise sentences on a page.  I think we should all learn punctuation from Virginia Woolf.

So, it’s 11 o’clock on a Saturday morning, and I’m still in my pyjamas, and I think I’ll go immerse myself in a fantasy world for another little bit before I face reality.  Dishes?  What dishes?  Dishes are better with absinthe.

Out of the Mouths of Babes

Jesus, Mary, Mohammad and Vishnu.

Look what these guys did.

You’ll have to watch Tom Milsom’s video first (the one down below), but then scroll down a little and watch all the responses.

Science, religion, history, biology, philosophy, sociology, anthropology….

Utterly, wickedly cool.

 

Forget This Universe…

I read this today on Radio Free School.

Then my cousin posted this on Facebook.

It’s like planets colliding in my head… which as not as disasterous as it sounds.  It makes nice little new planets.

I Like My Tree The Best

Sam in tree

In the movie Benny and Joon, the mentally ill Joon looks at Sam and says, “You’re out of your tree.”  Sam replies, “It’s not my tree.” (Try around 7:30 if you don’t want to watch the whole clip.)

These are some of the wisest words I’ve ever heard.

Yesterday, Walaikum asked me if I thought he was different than other students his age.  Short answer: yes.  The long one involves his thought processes and his personal views and his experiences (and the fact that no one is the same as anyone else).  Walaikum said he doesn’t want to be different, he wants to be “normal”.

I didn’t know what to say.

When I posted it on Facebook, one of my sisters made it a whole 9 minutes before not-so-subtly implying that perhaps he was talking to the wrong person if he’s looking for someone to put him on the path of conformity.

I’ve been thinking about it for 19 hours now; still can’t think of how to support Walaikum in his decision to be “normal”.  Think I’m going to have to be a terrible mentor and have at him about individuality.  Think I might have to find a way to demonstrate that his tree is the best tree for him.  Although, maybe it won’t be so terrible; while Walaikum doesn’t know me the way my sisters do, it must be pretty obvious that I don’t fit neatly into normal society.  Perhaps he knew what I would do.

Time to go plant a new tree.

Macleans Unschooling Article

University Without High School

The article ain’t much; the book is better.

College Without High School

Sports for Artists

My exposure to sports has been rather limited.  I used to watch hockey with my dad, cheering whenever the Montreal Canadiens got a goal… and then I learned to get out of my infant seat and I didn’t have to watch anymore.  My best friend and her son are into sports, so I’ll sometimes bring my knitting and sit on the sidelines to watch my pseudo-nephew run up and down a soccer field like a crazed bug; I like to make mental images of my friend clinging to the edge of her seat and muttering scatological obscenities when a bunch of pre-adolescent boys miss a chance at a goal, and then I describe the images to her later over a large glass of wine.  Other than that, I try to avoid sports.  They smell bad.

If I must do sports, I’ve found a way to enjoy them.  Montreal Mystique has this great little page called “Musings“.  Read at first out of obligation but now voluntarily, the sports parts are okay (really like the one-liners) but I live for the “intermissions”.   Being a good mother, I once took my kids to a baseball game at the Skydome (yes, it was still “the Skydome”) and we all agreed that intermission was the most entertaining part.   If Homme de Sept-Iles would just write about intermission all the time, I could honestly say “I like sports”.

Guide the Guidance Counselor with a Leash

A friend of mine just put her son back into the school system.  He had been homeschooled for Grades 7 and 8, but wanted to try high school.  The decision was rather last-minute and my friend didn’t have a portfolio put together (not that she could have done much anyway, as a good deal of her son’s learning was unschooling).  Their local school had insisted the boy sign up for Grade 9 applied levels for everything, because he would have to “catch up” to everyone else.

Homeschooling does not mean not learning.

The boy was transferred to academic levels this week because he was getting 100% in everything.  His mother is leaving him in applied English for next semester because he has no interest in English and doesn’t really care about literature; her son is not likely to go to university but if he does it certainly won’t be for English.  Seems reasonable to me.

While I will gladly tear strips off the stupid guidance counselor who guided this family so very badly, I suppose I must consider the chicken-or-egg theory.  Who taught this guidance counselor to be a guidance counselor?  There are many homeschoolers in that area, so it can’t be the only exposure the guy had to alternative education.  Are the school boards doing anything to ensure their employees are able to do their jobs?  I realise funds are tight but it wouldn’t cost them anything to have a couple of homeschoolers come in to talk with a new guidance counselor.

Walaikum recently had to write an essay about whether Canadians view post-secondary education as credential or educational.  He did a great job on it.  However, we spent about an hour and a half talking about the differences between the two adjectives.  The concept of  education purely for the sake of knowledge is a difficult thing for Walaikum to handle yet he deliberately asked questions until he understood.  If a high school student is able to do that, why can’t a guidance counselor?

« Older entries